Tagore, Bankim, & battle for Bengal’s soul: BJP in cultural crossfire
5 years later, as Bengal heads to elections once more, the BJP finds itself cornered over its Karnataka MP Visheshwar Hegde Kageri’s comment that the nationwide tune Vande Mataram, written in 1875 by one other Bengali icon Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay, ought to have been India’s nationwide anthem as an alternative of Tagore’s Jana Gana Mana.
Kageri’s remarks, coinciding with the Centre’s a hundred and fiftieth anniversary celebrations of the nationwide tune, are items of the BJP’s newest cultural fusillade towards the Congress. However its West Bengal unit has discovered itself pushed to the nook by the TMC, which has portrayed the remark as a slight to Tagore.
FIR for singing Amar Sonar Bangla
Including to the BJP’s troubles is Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma’s current route to file an FIR towards an aged Bengali Congress employee in Silchar for singing Tagore’s ‘Amar Sonar Bangla’, now the nationwide anthem of Bangladesh, at a celebration occasion final month. The transfer has sparked criticism and additional alienated Bengali sentiment.
In sharp distinction to 2021, when it invoked Tagore to tug at Bengal’s heartstrings, the BJP now finds itself defending towards accusations of slighting the bard in a state the place his legacy stays deeply emotional and politically potent.
In 1937, the Congress Working Committee had adopted the primary two stanzas of Vande Mataram to be sung on the celebration’s conferences and occasions, and after Independence this truncated model was made India’s nationwide tune.
The BJP claims that the Congress did so to appease sections of the Muslim group that opposed the references to idol worship within the full model of the tune.
Prime Minister Modi has led the BJP’s cost towards the Congress, accusing it of “sowing the seeds of partition” by adopting the truncated model.
The BJP’s standard narrative, nonetheless, sidesteps the function that Tagore performed in impressing upon the Congress management that it might not be imprudent to undertake solely the primary two stanzas of the tune for its “spirit of tenderness” and the emphasis it gave to the “lovely and beneficent elements of our motherland”.
The later components of the tune include intensive references to Hindu goddesses that followers of Islam, which is a monotheistic religion, weren’t snug with, notably with rising polarisation coinciding with the rise of the Muslim League.
The opposition additionally stemmed from Anandamath, Bankim Chandra Chatterjee’s novel a couple of rebel in mid-18th century Bengal set towards the backdrop of the famine. The tune was added to the novel when it was printed in 1882.
Historians have underlined that whereas in actuality the rebel was collectively pushed by Hindu ascetics and Muslim fakirs towards The East India Firm, in Bankim’s fictional account, the portrayal pitted Hindu sanyasis towards Muslims.
In ‘Delivery of a Goddess: Vande Mataram, Anandamath and Hindu Nationhood‘, historian Tanika Sarkar writes that the novel “forces a cut up between the brokers and victims of the famine: The brokers are Muslims and the ravenous and dying individuals are all the time recognized as Hindus.”
Vande Mataram in Bankim’s novel
Sarkar quotes a Hindu character within the novel as saying, “We are not looking for energy for ourselves. We need to exterminate all of the Muslims on this land as they’re enemies of God.” The presence of ‘Vande Mataram’ within the novel on this context has been a bone of competition amongst Muslims within the sub-continent since then.
But, the highly effective strains of nationalist sentiments embedded within the tune performed a pivotal function in the course of the Swadeshi motion towards the announcement of the partition of Bengal in 1903. Tagore himself set the tune for its first stanza, made Bankim take heed to it, and first sang it on the Calcutta session of the Congress in 1896.
Tagore stated he “discovered no problem in dissociating it from the remainder of the poem and from these parts of the e-book of which it’s a half, with all sentiments of which, introduced up as I used to be within the monotheistic beliefs of my father, I may don’t have any sympathy”.
Later, when the Muslim opposition towards the tune grew shriller, with Mohammed Ali Jinnah taking the lead, in Bengal, it was not simply Hindu conservatives, however sections of progressives, together with Ramananda Chattopadhyay, the editor of the Fashionable Assessment, who had additionally resisted any attainable truncation of the tune.
In March 1938, Mohammed Ali Jinnah had written in The New Instances of Lahore, “Muslims throughout (India) have refused to just accept Vande Mataram or any expurgated version of the anti-Muslim tune as a binding nationwide anthem.”
Round that point, the Congress management, caught in a bind, had reached out to Tagore, searching for his opinion on adopting the tune because the anthem of the celebration.
Prabhat Kumar Mukhopadhyay, the biographer of Tagore, had reproduced Tagore’s response by which he dominated out any outright rejection of the tune, underlining that it “first caught on as an acceptable nationwide anthem on the poignant interval of our strenuous wrestle for asserting the folks’s will towards the decree of separation hurled upon our province by the ruling energy.
“The next developments throughout which ‘Vande Mataram’ grew to become a nationwide slogan can not, in view of the stupendous sacrifices of a number of the better of our youths, be evenly ignored at a second when it has as soon as once more turn out to be mandatory to provide expression to our triumphant confidence within the victory of our trigger.”
Nevertheless, in a nuanced shift from his earlier place in mild of the modified circumstances, Tagore added that he freely concedes that the entire composition “learn along with its context is liable to be interpreted in ways in which would possibly wound Muslim susceptibilities”.
Nevertheless, he additionally constructed a powerful case for the retention of the primary two stanzas, saying they need to “needn’t remind us each time of the entire of it, a lot much less of the story with which it was by chance related. It has acquired a separate individuality and an inspiring significance of its personal by which I see nothing to offend any sect or group.”
On the 1937 CWC, the Congress embraced Tagore’s recommendation, with Nehru saying, “The primary two stanzas are such that it’s not possible for anybody to take objection to, except he’s maliciously inclined. Bear in mind, we’re pondering by way of a nationwide tune for all India.”
The CWC additionally adopted a decision saying that the primary two stanzas of this tune have turn out to be a “residing and inseparable a part of our nationwide motion and as such they need to command our affection and respect.”
“The Committee recognises the validity of the objection raised by Muslim mates to sure components of the tune. Whereas the committee have taken word of such objection in as far as it has intrinsic worth, the committee want to level out that the trendy evolution of using the tune as a part of nationwide life is of infinitely higher significance than its setting in a historic novel earlier than the nationwide motion had taken form,” it stated.
‘Handy alibi’
Chatting with ThePrint, BJP chief and writer Anirban Ganguly stated that the Congress and the TMC’s try to make use of Tagore to defend the CWC’s 1937 determination was a “handy alibi”.
Ganguly stated that had the Congress been “so obedient” to Tagore, it might not have disregarded his opinion when he tried to convey a couple of truce between Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose and the celebration’s excessive command in 1939.
“Vande Mataram was sung for 3 a long time from 1905 to Nineteen Thirties with none hindrance. And it is just when the Muslim League began protesting that the Congress started capitulating,” Ganguly added.
Former West Bengal BJP chief Dilip Ghosh accused the TMC of not paying sufficient respect to Bankim at a time the Centre had launched a year-long commemoration of 150 years of the tune.
“The TMC is disrespecting the nationwide icon and moderately than celebrating 150 years of the nationwide tune it has gone forward and issued a notification singing by (Rabindranath) Tagore obligatory in colleges throughout the State,” stated Ghosh.
He was referring to the TMC authorities’s determination to make the singing of Tagore’s “Banglar Maati, Banglar Jol” (Bengal’s soil, Bengal’s water), composed in 1905 towards the partition of Bengal, obligatory in morning faculty assemblies within the state.
(Edited by Viny Mishra)
Additionally learn: BJP’s ‘Hindu first’ ballot plank went from Bengal to UK. Will it assist the celebration in 2026?
Source link
latest video
latest pick
news via inbox
Nulla turp dis cursus. Integer liberos euismod pretium faucibua














