Resentment inside BJP over new UGC guidelines
Protesting towards the rules, higher caste college students have alleged the foundations are one-sided and, within the title of stopping discrimination, might the truth is promote “reverse bias” towards them.
Sections of the higher caste and normal class college students declare the brand new rules are susceptible to misuse. They level out that Fairness Committees—to be constituted by the pinnacle of the establishment to forestall discrimination—could have illustration solely from reserved classes.
They declare the norms don’t spell out satisfactory safeguards towards false or malicious complaints. Some college students and school warn that the rules could promote a tradition of surveillance on campuses.
Amid the escalating criticism, a number of BJP leaders declare the transfer will backfire, additional isolating the higher caste part of society from the BJP.
“Already, such selections have been taken by the federal government, that are fairly crucial of the Savarna (higher caste), and now it will influence our youngsters, the youthful technology. In right this moment’s time, when the provisions of reservation itself are being challenged, we’re bringing such rules! That is fully unacceptable,” mentioned a senior BJP chief from Uttar Pradesh.
The rules have additionally been criticised by the Karni Sena (a Rajput organisation), which mentioned the foundations have been delivered to suppress the Savarna society. The Karni Sena threatened to launch large-scale protests if the rules usually are not rolled again.
‘The Occasion’s tally bought lowered to 240 (in 2024 LS polls), & conclusion that was drawn was that it was as a result of SC & ST communities didn’t help BJP. If this (UGC norms) shouldn’t be withdrawn, celebration must face penalties,’ says BJP chief from UP.
Additionally Learn: Sole NDA ally to query Centre’s draft guidelines on college V-C appointments, what’s JD(U)’s stand
Letter to PM
A number of native BJP leaders have expressed anger over the transfer and resigned celebration posts. Shyam Sundar Tripathi, the district president of the BJP’s Kisan Morcha in Salon (Rae Bareli), wrote a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and resigned from his celebration submit.
“I’ve resigned from my submit as a mark of protest. I’m nonetheless a major member of the celebration, however the rules which have been launched are fully unjust and towards the final class college students,” Tripathi, who joined the BJP in 2019, instructed ThePrint.
In his letter to the PM on January 25, Tripathi mentioned he was resigning his submit as a result of “black legal guidelines” just like the UGC guidelines introduced “towards the kids of higher castes”.
“This legislation is extraordinarily dangerous to society and is divisive. I’m fully towards it. I can’t help such unethical rules as they’re fully at odds with my self-respect and beliefs,” he added.
In line with a senior celebration chief, many higher caste leaders really feel the celebration has been taking them without any consideration.
“The celebration’s tally bought lowered to 240, and the conclusion that was drawn was that it was as a result of the SC and ST communities didn’t help the BJP. They’ve been arising with one scheme after one other for his or her welfare, and we’ve stored quiet. However now, it’s about the way forward for our youngsters, and the transfer is totally discriminatory. If this isn’t withdrawn, the celebration must face penalties,” mentioned a senior BJP chief.
“They’re underestimating the unity of the higher castes. In the event that they get collectively, nobody will be capable to counter us. The celebration must introspect,” he added.
Devendra Pratap Singh, a senior Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council member, additionally raised critical objections to the UGC rules. Singh wrote a letter to the UGC on 22 January, warning that the transfer might “fracture social concord and intensify caste battle” throughout the nation.
He urged the UGC to rethink the framework. Singh mentioned the rules, as framed, might disturb the social steadiness and widen caste-based divisions. He pressured that whereas fairness is critical, it should not undermine social cohesion or marginalise any part of scholars.
“The choice made by the College Grants Fee (UGC) will shatter social concord and improve caste battle in society. It will create a deep divide in society and destroy the training surroundings in universities and better schooling establishments. This regulation is extremely more likely to be misused,” Singh wrote within the letter. He instructed ThePrint that he has communicated solely with the UGC to this point.
“The regulation you may have created will change into a robust weapon for the oppression of the final class. The target of the College Grants Fee (UGC) 2026 (rules) must be to forestall the oppression of Dalit and backward class college students, to not make normal class college students insecure,” he added.
One other BJP chief, Mrigendra Upadhyay from Balrampur in Uttar Pradesh, additionally resigned, in response to media reviews, terming it the UGC norms anti-Brahmins and towards the final class.
मोदी है तो मुमकिन है,विश्वास रखिए UGC नोटिफिकेशन की सभी भ्रान्तियों को दूर किया जाएगा । संविधान को आर्टिकलों 14 एवं 15 के अनुसार अनुसूचित जाति,अनुसूचित जनजाति,पिछड़े वर्ग और सामान्य वर्ग में कोई फर्क नहीं है। 10 प्रतिशत आरक्षण सामान्य वर्ग को केवल और केवल माननीय प्रधानमंत्री मोदी…
— Dr Nishikant Dubey (@nishikant_dubey) January 25, 2026
Involved over the criticism the celebration is dealing with from exterior in addition to inside, Nishikant Dubey, a BJP MP and senior celebration chief, tried to deal with the problem. He mentioned so long as Prime Minister Narendra Modi is there, no hurt will come to the kids of the final class.
“Modi ji, on changing into the prime minister, secured recognition from the Supreme Court docket for the higher caste society and supplied 10 p.c reservation – that is the reality,” he posted on January 24.
Upholding Article 14 of the Structure drafted by Babasaheb Ambedkar is in line with the Structure’s core spirit, and it can’t be tampered with, he mentioned. “Don’t fall for deceptive claims. Underneath Modi ji’s management, there shall be no discrimination in a BJP authorities—that is Modi’s assure, which even a small employee like me is providing you with.”
Dubey reiterated the purpose in a number of posts on X and questioned the “misunderstanding” being created. “Relaxation assured, the UGC’s rule will apply equally to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Courses, in addition to the final class. This isn’t politics; the nation runs on the Structure of Babasaheb Ambedkar ji.”
“Modi hai toh mumkin hai. All misconceptions concerning the UGC notification shall be cleared. In line with Articles 14 and 15 of the Structure, there isn’t any distinction between the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes, the Backward Courses, and the Basic Class,” he wrote on X on Sunday.
‘After implementation of Mandal Fee in 1990, all political events on this nation shaped governments, however justice was delivered solely by Modi ji. Wait and watch—misconceptions about UGC will even come to an finish,’ BJP chief Nishikant Dubey.
Nonetheless, many identified on his posts that, as per the rules, caste-based discrimination refers to discrimination based mostly on caste or tribe towards members of SC, ST and OBC communities.
Dubey argued that the ten p.c reservation for the final class was granted solely and solely due to Prime Minister Modi. “After the implementation of the Mandal Fee in 1990, all political events on this nation shaped governments, however justice was delivered solely by Modi ji. Wait and watch– the misconceptions about UGC will even come to an finish,” he added.
With Uttar Pradesh meeting elections due in early 2027, many leaders really feel, the problem can take a political angle.
‘Discrimination in software’
Senior Congress chief and normal secretary of the celebration, Jitendra Singh Alwar criticised the federal government over the transfer.
“Discrimination based mostly on faith, caste, gender, and background is unacceptable not solely in instructional establishments/universities/faculties but in addition in any civilized society. The ‘Promotion of Fairness in Larger Schooling Establishments Laws, 2026’ applied by the UGC seems to be an try and divide college students towards one another and switch them into adversaries,” he posted on X.
The UGC’s new tips spotlight the central authorities’s intention, which is anti-student, geared toward concentrating on and deceptive college students whereas looking for to dismantle our instructional establishments, he claimed.
धर्म, जाति, जेंडर और बैकग्राउंड के आधार पर होने वाला भेदभाव एजुकेशनल इंस्टीट्यूट/यूनिवर्सिटी/कॉलेज के साथ ही किसी भी सभ्य समाज में स्वीकार्य नहीं है।
UGC द्वारा लागू किए गए ‘Promotion of Fairness in Larger Schooling Establishments Laws, 2026’ स्टूडेंट्स को आपस में बांटने, एक…
— Jitendra Singh Alwar (@JitendraSAlwar) January 26, 2026
Former Uttar Pradesh Congress chief Ajay Kumar Lallu mentioned, “The Modi authorities believes that with the assistance of those guidelines, it would show itself to be the champion of social justice, and it’ll achieve the belief of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, in addition to Different Backward Courses. After struggling a extreme defeat in Uttar Pradesh within the Lok Sabha elections, Mr. Modi considers this his masterstroke”.
Amongst different Opposition events, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi too raised sturdy objections to the rules.
“Any type of caste-based discrimination on campus is unsuitable, and in India, many college students have already suffered the dire penalties of it. However shouldn’t the legislation be inclusive and guarantee safety is assured to all? Why this discrimination within the software of the legislation?” she posted on X.
She additional questioned the absence of safeguards towards misuse of those rules and what occurs in case of false circumstances being filed.
“How will guilt be decided? How ought to discrimination be outlined—via phrases, actions, or perceptions? The method of implementing the legislation must be clear, exact and equitable for all. Subsequently, as a substitute of making a unfavourable environment on campus, I urge that the UGC’s notification be both withdrawn or amended as needed.”
(Edited by Ajeet Tiwari)
Additionally Learn:Centre types knowledgeable panel to overview UGC draft curriculum amid considerations over ‘grave defects’
latest video
latest pick
news via inbox
Nulla turp dis cursus. Integer liberos euismod pretium faucibua











