New Delhi: The Delhi Excessive court docket on Wednesday heard submissions on behalf of Baramulla MP Abdul Rashid Sheikh, alias Engineer Rashid, who’s praying for modification of the order imposing a situation to bear bills to attend the parliament in custody.

It was submitted by senior counsel on behalf of Rashid that he’s unable to characterize the individuals of his constituency because of this situation imposed on him.

The division bench comprising justices Vivek Chaudhary and Anup Jairam Bhambhani listed the matter for additional listening to on August 12.

Senior advocate N. Hariharan, together with advocate Vikhyat Oberoi appeared for Engineer Rashid. They submitted that he’s searching for modification of the order relating to the bills.

Justice Chaudhary stated that you’re searching for a assessment of earlier order.

The Courtroom requested the counsel Inform us whether or not it’s maintainable for modification or in assessment?? Can we hear otherwise you to go earlier than the larger bench.

Senior Hariharan stated that I’m not difficult the advantage of the order. I simply need modification of the associated fee imposed.

I’m not difficult the order; I’m not searching for assessment of the court docket. I’m simply searching for a modification, senior counsel submitted.

Senior counsel Siddharth Luthra appeared for NIA and submitted that the order handed by the court docket was a consent order.

The senior counsel for Engineer Rashid submitted that the interim bail was argued. We agreed for custody parole, not the price of travelling.

He was granted parole with out a value earlier. He was requested to pay the bills from the third time. Earlier he was allowed to attend the parliament with out paying any value.

The bench stated that each time the custody parole is granted, the bills are borne by the one that acquired reduction.

The bench stated that we referred to the supreme court docket order in Tahir Husain case. Said has computed some expense. How can this be justifiable earlier than us?

On the final listening to, one other bench has requested the counsel for Rashid to press the modification software earlier than the involved bench that had handed the order on March 25.

This report is auto-generated from PTI information service. ThePrint holds no duty for its content material.