272 eminent voices defend EC in open letter to Rahul Gandhi

272 eminent voices defend EC in open letter to Rahul Gandhi

Last Updated: November 19, 2025By

New Delhi: A bunch of eminent residents comprising judges, retired civil servants and diplomats, and retired armed forces officers have accused the Congress and Lok Sabha Chief of Opposition Rahul Gandhi of trying to tarnish establishments just like the Election Fee after concentrating on the judiciary and armed forces, amongst others.

A bunch of 272 eminent residents consisting of 16 judges, 123 retired civil servants (together with 14 ambassadors), 133 retired armed forces officers have written the open letter.

“After their makes an attempt to tarnish the Indian armed forces by questioning their valour and accomplishments, and the judiciary by questioning its equity, Parliament and its constitutional functionaries, now it’s the flip of the Election Fee of India to face systematic and conspiratorial assaults on its integrity and repute,” reads the open letter to Rahul Gandhi.

The letter states that the accusations are an try and drape political frustration within the garb of institutional disaster.

A number of prime Congress leaders have attributed the INDIA bloc’s crushing defeat within the Bihar meeting elections to a “collusion” between the Election Fee and the ruling NDA, resulting in an uneven enjoying discipline.

The letter to Rahul Gandhi urges the civil society and the residents of India to face firmly with the Election Fee, “not out of flattery, however out of conviction”.

“Society ought to demand that political actors cease undermining this very important establishment with baseless allegations and theatrical denunciations. As a substitute, they need to supply the general public severe coverage options, significant reform concepts, and a nationwide imaginative and prescient rooted in actuality”, the letter states.

The checklist consists of many former ambassadors similar to Lakshmi Puri, spouse of Union Minister Hardeep Puri, Gauri Shankar Gupta, Deepak Vohra, former Delhi Excessive Court docket choose S.N. Dhingra, former Chief Justice of Karnataka Shubro Kamal Mukherjee, former R&AW chief Sanjeev Tripathi (now with the BJP), former director of NIA Yogesh Chander Modi, amongst others.

The letter states that Rahul Gandhi had repeatedly attacked the Election Fee, declaring that he has open and shut proof that EC is concerned in vote theft.

The letter goes on to say that Rahul Gandhi made use of “unbelievably uncouth rhetoric” when he mentioned “that what he had discovered is an atom bomb and when it explodes, the EC would don’t have any place to cover. He has additionally issued threats that whoever within the Election Fee is concerned on this train, proper from prime to backside, he won’t spare them.”

They additional argue that Rahul Gandhi has claimed that ECI is indulging in treason. “He has gone on file to threaten that if CEC/EC are retired, he’ll hound them. But, regardless of such scathing accusations, there was no formal criticism filed by him, together with the prescribed sworn affidavit, to flee his accountability for levelling unsubstantiated allegations and threatening public servants in efficiency of their obligation,” they add.

Forward of the Bihar meeting elections, the Congress had launched an almost two-week-long ‘Vote Adhikar Yatra’ in Bihar, led by Gandhi, overlaying 50 meeting constituencies throughout 23 districts to mobilise public assist forward of the polls.

The letter claims that many senior Congress leaders and different political events, “Leftist” NGOs and ideologically opinionated students have joined in with comparable rhetoric in opposition to SIR, even declaring that the fee has descended into full “shamelessness” by performing just like the “B-team of the BJP”.

Such fiery rhetoric, they are saying, could also be emotionally highly effective nevertheless it collapses underneath scrutiny, as a result of the ECI has publicly shared its SIR methodology, overseen verification by court-sanctioned means, eliminated ineligible names in a compliant method, and added new eligible voters.

The open letter additional factors out that “this sample of behaviour” displays what may be known as “impotent rage… deep anger born of repeated electoral failure and frustration, with no concrete plan to reconnect with the individuals”.

They additional declare that when political leaders lose contact with the aspirations of strange residents, they “lash out” at establishments as a substitute of rebuilding their credibility.

“Theatrics exchange evaluation. Public spectacle takes the place of public service. The irony is stark: When electoral outcomes are beneficial in sure States the place opposition-driven political events type governments, criticism of the Election Fee disappears. When they’re unfavourable in sure States, the Fee turns into the villain in each narrative,” they add.

The selective outrage, they are saying, exposes opportunism and never conviction. “It’s a handy deflection: To present the impression that loss shouldn’t be a results of technique, however conspiracy. India’s democracy rests on establishments constructed by our founding era, who engaged in principled and disciplined politics, even underneath essentially the most severe variations. They defended the sanctity of democratic constructions, even after they had each cause to query them. They sought to strengthen, to not undermine, the constitutional bedrock,” the letter provides.

The open letter to Rahul Gandhi additionally touches upon the difficulty of who ought to discover a place in India’s voters. Pretend or bogus voters, non-citizens, and people who do not need a respectable stake in India’s future will need to have no place in deciding its authorities—permitting them to affect elections is a grave risk to the sovereignty and stability of the nation. Internationally, democracies deal with unlawful immigration firmly, it provides.

The letter goes on to state that the US rigorously detains and deports unauthorised entrants and bars them from voting whereas the UK locations everlasting restrictions on civic rights for irregular residents.

“Australia enforces strict offshore detention to manage who can originate claims. Japan and South Korea preserve tight screening and speedy deportation processes. Even in Europe, nations like Germany and France have tightened enforcement; they insist citizenship issues when safeguarding democratic establishments. If different nations guard the electoral integrity of their states so resolutely, India should be equally proactive. The sanctity of our electoral rolls shouldn’t be a partisan situation—it’s a nationwide crucial,” it mentioned.

(Edited by Viny Mishra)


Additionally learn: Seven the explanation why Rahul Gandhi’s voter fraud declare should be taken with a pinch of salt


 


Source link

Leave A Comment

you might also like