Throughout a Reddit ask-me-anything session on Friday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and key members of the GPT-5 workforce have been peppered with questions in regards to the new mannequin and requests to deliver again its earlier mannequin, GPT-4o.

Additionally they requested Altman about probably the most embarrassing — and maybe funniest — snafu within the presentation, the “chart crime.”

One of many new options that GPT-5 rolled out is a real-time router that decides which mannequin to make use of for a selected immediate, both responding rapidly or taking extra time to “suppose” by solutions.

However a number of folks within the AMA on the r/ChatGPT Reddit complained GPT-5 wasn’t working as effectively for them as 4o did. Altman mentioned the rationale GPT-5 appeared “dumber” was the router wasn’t working correctly when it was rolled out Thursday.

“GPT-5 will appear smarter beginning at this time. Yesterday, we had a sev and the autoswitcher was out of fee for a bit of the day, and the consequence was GPT-5 appeared manner dumber. Additionally, we’re making some interventions to how the choice boundary works that ought to show you how to get the proper mannequin extra usually. We’ll make it extra clear about which mannequin is answering a given question,” Altman promised.

Nonetheless, folks on the AMA lobbied so exhausting to deliver 4o again for Plus subscribers that Altman promised to at the very least look into that. “We’re wanting into letting Plus customers to proceed to make use of 4o. We try to assemble extra information on the tradeoffs,” he wrote.

And Altman additionally promised, “We’re going to double charge limits for Plus customers as we end rollout.” This could give folks an opportunity to play and be taught the brand new mannequin, undertake it to their use instances with out fear of operating out of month-to-month prompts.

Predictably, he was additionally requested in regards to the wildly inaccurate chart the workforce introduced through the dwell presentation that rapidly turned the butt of many “chart crime” jokes. The chart introduced a decrease benchmark rating with a a lot taller bar. 

Altman didn’t reply questions in regards to the chart through the AMA, however on Thursday he did name the chart a “mega chart screwup” on X. Others famous the charts within the published blog post were correct.

However the harm was performed. Jokes ensued about utilizing GPT for charts in a company presentation. GPT-5 reviewer Simon Willison, who had early entry and usually appreciated the mannequin’s efficiency, also pointed out that turning information right into a desk was “good instance of a GPT-5 failure.”

In any case, Altman promised fixes to the gadgets that appeared to concern folks probably the most. He ended the AMA with a promise: “We’ll proceed to work to get issues steady and can maintain listening to suggestions.”