The battle over the late industrialist Sunjay Kapur’s Will, has already turn into one of the crucial intently watched authorized disputes contemplating its connection to Sunjay’s kids with actress Karisma Kapoor, Samaira and Kiaan. It has additional intensified within the Delhi Excessive Court docket as new arguments solid doubt on the credibility of Priya Kapur’s defence.

Priya Kapur’s ‘place swap’ defence faces main setback in Sunjay Kapur Will case: Court docket flags energy seize, lacking attachment and “suspicious suppression”

Senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, representing Samaira and Kiaan, dismantled Priya Kapur’s long-standing declare that her 2023 exit from Automotive India Pvt Ltd (AIPL) was a consensual “place swap” with Sunjay. As an alternative, he described her elimination on 31 Could 2023 as a direct fallout of marital discord—arguing that company filings reveal she neither turned Managing Director of Raghuvanshi Funding Pvt Ltd (RIPL) nor held any position within the firm.

Based on Jethmalani, “Priya was by no means made the MD of RIPL… She was faraway from AIPL,” countering her assertions of a clean company restructuring. The absence of any parallel appointment, he mentioned, undermines her narrative of a secure blended household and seamless transition—an particularly related level given her repeated references to cordial ties with Karisma Kapoor’s kids.

What adopted Sunjay’s dying in June 2023 is now beneath even sharper scrutiny. Data offered in courtroom present Priya was appointed as a director of AIPL a day after his passing, and reinstated herself as Managing Director inside per week. Jethmalani argued this mirrored not continuity, however opportunism: “She was not in management when Sunjay was alive. She sought management solely after his passing.”

The company timeline, the plaintiffs argue, aligns too conveniently with the sudden look of a contested Will—a doc central to figuring out the authorized rights of Sunjay’s heirs, together with Karisma’s kids.

Complicating issues additional is the conduct of the named executor Shradha Suri Marwah, who, based on submissions, neither pursued probate nor took cost of Sunjay’s property as required. Jethmalani contended that an executor can’t selectively implement components of a Will. The courtroom was additionally informed that Shradha claimed to have “deleted” an important e-mail attachment containing the alleged Will—regardless of the e-mail itself being produced in courtroom.

“You can not delete the attachment with out deleting the e-mail,” Jethmalani argued, highlighting what he described as an “inconceivable rationalization” and pointing to the suspicious disappearance of a supporting doc that appeared in an earlier e-mail however not within the closing model.

With the matter listed once more for December 22, the courtroom will proceed to look at inconsistencies round Priya’s company position, post-death actions, and the lacking attachment—points that now lie on the coronary heart of a dispute carrying important implications for Sunjay Kapur’s kids, his legacy, and the companies he as soon as helmed.

Additionally Learn: Karisma Kapoor renews Rs 66 lakhs Bandra apartment lease amid battle over Sunjay Kapur’s Rs 30,000-crores estate: Report

Tags : Bollywood, Children, Death, Delhi High Court, Demise, Karisma Kapoor, Kiaan Kapur, Kids, Legal case, News, Priya Kapur, Priya Sachdev, Samaira Kapur, Sunjay Kapur, Sunjay Kapur Will Case

BOLLYWOOD NEWS – LIVE UPDATES

Catch us for contemporary Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies replace, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Entertainment News, Bollywood Live News Today & Upcoming Movies 2025 and keep up to date with newest hindi films solely on Bollywood Hungama.