Kejriwal breaks down after court docket discharges him in Delhi excise coverage case

Kejriwal breaks down after court docket discharges him in Delhi excise coverage case

Last Updated: February 27, 2026By

New Delhi : Following his discharge by Rouse Avenue Courtroom in Delhi Excise Coverage case, AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal on Friday broke down exterior court docket as he emphasised that he was not corrupt, including that the court docket had mentioned that each he and Manish Sisodia have been “trustworthy”.

Talking to reporters, Kejriwal additionally accused PM Narendra Modi and Dwelling Minister Amit Shah of hatching the most important political conspiracy of impartial India. He additionally alleged that the BJP deliberate to complete the Aam Aadmi Occasion by placing its high 5 leaders whereas asserting that he has all the time mentioned that the “reality emerges victorious.”

“I’m not corrupt. The court docket has mentioned that Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia are trustworthy. In the present day, the court docket has discharged all accused on this case. We all the time mentioned that the reality emerges victorious. We’ve got full religion within the Indian authorized system. Amit Shah and Modi ji collectively hatched the most important political conspiracy to complete AAP and 5 massive leaders of the celebration have been put in jail. The sitting CM was dragged out of his home and put in jail. Kejriwal will not be corrupt. I’ve solely earned honesty in my life. In the present day, the court docket has mentioned that Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and AAP are trustworthy,” Kejriwal mentioned.

Manish Sisodia additionally hailed the Courts resolution saying that the reality has emerged victorious
“Satyamev Jayate. In the present day, as soon as once more, I really feel pleased with Baba Saheb Ambedkar Ji’s visionary considering and the Structure he crafted. Regardless of all of the makes an attempt by Modi Ji’s complete celebration and all their companies to show us dishonest, at the moment it has been confirmed that Arvind Kejriwal – Manish Sisodia are staunchly trustworthy,” he mentioned.

The Rouse Avenue Courtroom on Friday discharged Former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia within the Delhi Excise Coverage case.

The court docket noticed that the alleged central conspiratorial position couldn’t be substantiated.

The court docket famous that the allegations “failed judicial scrutiny” and located “no legal intent” on the a part of Manish Sisodia. It additional said that the conspiracy idea “can’t survive in opposition to one constitutional authority.”

The CBI filed its first chargesheet in 2022, adopted by a number of supplementary chargesheets. The company has alleged that Rs 100 crore was paid by a “south foyer” to affect the now-scrapped excise coverage in its favour.

In whole, 23 accused have been chargesheeted, together with Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, Okay Kavitha, Kuldeep Singh, Narender Singh, Vijay Nair, Abhishek Boinpally, Arun Ramchandra Pillai, Mootha Goutam, Sameer Mahendru, Amandeep Singh Dhall, Arjun Pandey, Butchibabu Gornatla, Rakesh Joshi, Damodar Prasad Sharma, Prince Kumar, Chanpreet Singh Rayat, Arvind Kumar Singh, Durgesh Pathak, Amit Arora, Vinod Chauhan, Ashish Mathur, and P Sarath Chadra Reddy.

Throughout arguments, the CBI maintained that the offence of legal conspiracy should be considered in its entirety and that the sufficiency of proof ought to be examined throughout trial. Represented by Extra Solicitor Common D P Singh and advocate Manu Mishra, the company argued that there’s sufficient materials to border expenses in opposition to all of the accused.

Alternatively, senior advocate N Hariharan, appeared for Kejriwal, contended that there isn’t any incriminating materials linking his consumer to the alleged conspiracy. He argued that the fourth supplementary chargesheet naming Kejriwal merely repackages earlier allegations and that Kejriwal was performing his official duties as Chief Minister.

Hariharan additional submitted that Kejriwal was not named within the preliminary chargesheet or in three earlier supplementary chargesheets. His title appeared solely within the fourth. The defence additionally questioned the idea of additional investigation and the evidentiary worth of statements, together with that of approver Raghav Magunta.

This report is auto-generated from ANI information service. ThePrint holds no accountability for its content material.


Source link

Leave A Comment

you might also like