Chennai: The continuing feud within the Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) between founder S. Ramadoss and his son Anbumani has escalated into an open conflict, with the previous dragging Anbumani to the Madras Excessive Court docket and asserting that he can not “sit dummy” and provides the social gathering away to him.

“I can not give the social gathering to Anbumani and sit dummy at my Thailapuram residence,” Ramadoss instructed reporters at his residence Thursday. He additionally alleged that Anbumani had modified the social gathering headquarters’ handle to his personal residence with out Ramadoss’s information.

Ramadoss additional stated the combat between him and his son started due to distinction in opinion over the social gathering’s alliances and candidates. “The basis explanation for all the issues is that Anbumani needed to determine the alliance and he needed to determine the candidates for the constituencies,” he claimed.

Ramadoss additionally alleged that Anbumani had requested to offer the social gathering to him and to not meet social gathering employees at his residence. “Those that got here to pacify and maintain talks additionally conveyed the identical. How can I give away the social gathering that I based, held and guarded for 36 years?”

He made the statements a day after he moved the excessive court docket to restrain Anbumani from holding the social gathering’s basic council assembly on 9 August at Mahabalipuram.

In his petition, filed by S. Murali Shankar, who was appointed as basic secretary of PMK by Ramadoss, he phrases the assembly as “extraordinarily unlawful”.

“Anbumani’s calling for a basic council assembly is an especially unlawful act and the assembly was known as with an ulterior motive to create confusion among the many cadres. Such conferences known as by Anbumani would solely create regulation and order points,” states the petition filed in court docket, seen by ThePrint.

Requested about it, PMK’s treasurer M. Thilagabama, who is claimed to be a part of the Anbumani camp, instructed ThePrint that it was a household dispute and could be resolved quickly. “Simply because a father scolds a son, it doesn’t imply that there isn’t a relationship between them. Each of them are selfless individuals and they’d undoubtedly be part of collectively for a standard trigger and that widespread trigger could be the welfare of the social gathering and its employees,” he stated.

ThePrint additionally reached Anbumani, who declined to remark.

In the meantime, political analysts in Tamil Nadu ThePrint spoke to had been of the opinion that the tussle in PMK would finish when the elections come nearer.

Political analyst Raveendran Duraisamy stated the leaders know their power electorally and wouldn’t let that weaken due to their rivalry. “Provided that father and son are collectively, will they’ve negotiating energy and search extra seats. Each should concentrate on it and the tug-of-war would subside throughout seat-sharing talks or in the midst of discussing the alliance.”

---

Additionally Learn: PMK founder Ramadoss says son Anbumani ‘held his toes & cried’ for tie-up with BJP for 2024 LS polls

---

‘Anbumani shouldn’t be PMK president’

The petition filed earlier than the excessive court docket claims that Anbumani’s tenure as president of PMK ended on 28 Might, 2025. “The appointment of key workplace functionaries within the social gathering is finished by the founder on the recommendation of the chief administrative committee, state government committee and the state basic physique as per the social gathering’s bylaws,” reads the petition.

It provides that Ramadoss was nominated as PMK president on 30 Might after finish of tenure of Anbumani, and that the founding father of the social gathering is the only authority to nominate and organise conferences in his personal capability.

Based on the petition, a number of complaints have been filed in opposition to Anbumani with the police and Election Fee looking for motion in opposition to his “unlawful actions”.

Chatting with reporters Thursday, Ramadoss, nonetheless, asserted he didn’t need to take motion in opposition to Anbumani. “We can not take a choice like that swiftly,” he stated.

How spat started

The spat between the daddy and son started throughout the particular basic council assembly of the PMK held in late December 2024, over the appointment of Ramadoss’s grandson P. Mukundan as youth wing president.

On the assembly, whereas Ramadoss defended his choice to nominate Mukundan, stating that he had the appropriate to make any choice as PMK founder, Anbumani objected, asking how an individual who had joined the social gathering simply 4 months earlier could possibly be given such a put up.

5 months later, on 29 Might, Ramadoss met reporters at his residence in Villupuram and expressed remorse over nominating Anbumani as Union Cupboard Minister on the age of 35.

He additionally accused Anbumani of sparking inside division throughout the social gathering by disrespecting senior leaders. “Anbumani neither listens to the 19-member government committee nor permits them to specific their views,” he alleged.

In response, Anbumani alleged in July that Tamil Nadu’s ruling DMK and its allies had been conspiring to trigger bother throughout the PMK. Later, on 21 July, Ramadoss suspended three MLAs and a spokesperson supporting Anbumani for “performing in opposition to the curiosity of the social gathering”.

The feud escalated after Ramadoss alleged that his son had planted a bugging machine at his residence. He had additionally filed a criticism with the police on this regard. On 2 August, Ramadoss instructed reporters that he had employed a particular company to search out out who was spying on him.

“If there’s a son who spied on his personal father, it’s Anbumani,” he instructed reporters. Nevertheless, advocate Ok. Balu, a senior PMK chief now believed to be in Anbumani’s camp, denied the allegations.

(Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui)

---

Additionally Learn: PMK basis day overshadowed by father-son feud as Anbumani Ramadoss pitches for share in TN govt

---